State v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Brown

456 So. 2d 527, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15089

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 18, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2663

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 527 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 456 So. 2d 527, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15089 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State’s petition for writ of certiorari asks us to quash an order of the trial court which disqualified the office of the State Attorney from further participation in the prosecution of Brown for armed robbery. Brown successfully contended below that because an Assistant State Attorney, one Dennis Nowak, was to be a witness for the prosecution, all other members of the State Attorney’s office are disqualified from prosecuting Brown, and such task must necessarily be assigned to a special prosecutor who has no affiliation with the State Attorney’s office.

For the reasons set forth in the substantially identical case of Clausell v. State, 455 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (en banc), we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State’s petition for writ of certiorari asks us to quash an order of the trial court which disqualified the office of the State Attorney from further participation in the prosecution of Brown for armed robbery. Brown successfully contended below that because an Assistant State Attorney, one Dennis Nowak, was to be a witness for the prosecution, all other members of the State Attorney’s office are disqualified from prosecuting Brown, and such task must necessarily be assigned to a special prosecutor who has no affiliation with the State Attorney’s office.

For the reasons set forth in the substantially identical case of Clausell v. State, 455 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (en banc), we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Certiorari denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 So. 2d 527, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack