State v. Broussard
This text of 268 So. 2d 248 (State v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
' The defendant was convicted for violation of La.R.S. 26:88 (allowing “B” drinking) and appeals.
Inasmuch as no bills of exceptions were .perfected, we are limited on appeal to a review of errors discoverable on the face of the pleadings and proceedings. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920. We find none. .
Although in brief in this Court .the accused urges the statute under which, he is charged is unconstitutional, this issue was not properly raised in the trial; court and is not before us on appeal. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 532, 859; State v. Leming, 217 La. 257, 46 So.2d 262 (1950); State v. Kavanaugh, 203 La. 1, 13 So.2d 366 (1943).
The conviction and sentence are. affirmed. ...
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 So. 2d 248, 263 La. 342, 1972 La. LEXIS 5415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broussard-la-1972.