State v. Brothers

433 A.2d 695, 139 Vt. 655
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided June 12, 1981·No. No. 345-79·Published

Opinion

In September of 1980, the present case was scheduled to be argued before this Court. At the hearing it was revealed the defendant had escaped from custody. This Court, although not required to do so, continued the case pending the recapture of the defendant. Ten months have elapsed and the defendant has not been returned to custody. We, therefore, decline to adjudicate his case and direct that the appeal be dismissed. Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365 (1970); State v. Leslie, 166 Conn. 393, 349 A.2d 843 (1974); Redden v. State, 418 A.2d 996 (Del. 1980); Commonwealth v. Hurley, 414 N.E.2d 1006 (Mass. 1981).

[656] H

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brothers, 433 A.2d 695, 139 Vt. 655 (Vt. 1981).

433 A.2d 695 (State v. Brothers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Molinaro v. New Jersey
396 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Leslie
349 A.2d 843 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1974)
Redden v. State
418 A.2d 996 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Hurley
414 N.E.2d 1006 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1981)