Redden v. State

418 A.2d 996, 1980 Del. LEXIS 406
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 25, 1980·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant was convicted of robbery, assault, and possession of a deadly weapon *997 during the commission of a felony. He appealed to this Court alleging numerous grounds for reversal. Subsequent to the filing of this appeal, the defendant escaped from custody while being transported by the Department of Corrections.

An escapee has no right to appellate procedures while he remains a fugitive. Crawford v. State, Del.Supr., 94 A.2d 603 (1953). By escaping during the pendency of his appeal, the defendant has waived any right to a disposition of his direct appeal of his conviction and sentence. Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970). We note that, should the defendant be returned to custody, he will have a remedy for any constitutional errors in his trial under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a).

As a result of the defendant’s escape prior to disposition of this matter, and upon motion by the State, we dismiss this appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redden v. State, 418 A.2d 996, 1980 Del. LEXIS 406 (Del. 1980).

418 A.2d 996 (Redden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahmed v. Oak Management Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2023
State v. Bailon Wences
Washington Supreme Court, 2017
Smolka v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware, 2015
State v. Hentges
844 N.W.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
Schmidt v. Schmidt
610 A.2d 1374 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1992)
State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. Billman
580 A.2d 1044 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
State v. Brothers
433 A.2d 695 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1981)