State v. Bright

701 So. 2d 136, 1997 La. LEXIS 2656, 1997 WL 589992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bright. Read the opinion of the Court — 776 So. 2d 1134
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 17, 1997·No. No. 97-KK-2322·Published

Opinion

In re Bright, Raynell; —Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 376-884; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-2058.

Granted; stay recalled. To the extent that counsel’s application in this Court reurges the arguments made in his motions filed before trial began with jury selection and before our stay issued, we construe his present application as a request for a mistrial and discharge of the selected jurors. So construed, the application is granted, the stay recalled, and the case remanded to the trial court with instructions to declare a mistrial and to discharge the selected jurors. In addition, the district court is ordered to enter a plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity on relator’s behalf and to reset trial within a reasonable time.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bright, 701 So. 2d 136, 1997 La. LEXIS 2656, 1997 WL 589992 (La. 1997).

701 So. 2d 136 (State v. Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.