State v. Bright

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bright

684 So. 2d 954, 1996 La. LEXIS 3676, 1996 WL 755173

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 20, 1996

DocketNo. 96-KD-3040

StatusPublished

This text of 684 So. 2d 954 (State v. Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bright, 684 So. 2d 954, 1996 La. LEXIS 3676, 1996 WL 755173 (La. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Bright, Dan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-994.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the stay and entertain the application at the next conference. MARCUS, J., would grant and remand to the court of appeal. This Court had no appellate jurisdiction since a penalty of death has not been actually imposed. La. Const, art. V, Section 5(D). LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bright, Dan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-994.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the stay and entertain the application at the next conference. MARCUS, J., would grant and remand to the court of appeal. This Court had no appellate jurisdiction since a penalty of death has not been actually imposed. La. Const, art. V, Section 5(D). LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 So. 2d 954, 1996 La. LEXIS 3676, 1996 WL 755173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bright-la-1996.