State v. Bright

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bright

684 So. 2d 954, 1996 La. LEXIS 3676, 1996 WL 755173

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bright. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 La. LEXIS 4104 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 20, 1996·No. No. 96-KD-3040·Published

Opinion

In re Bright, Dan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-994.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the stay and entertain the application at the next conference. MARCUS, J., would grant and remand to the court of appeal. This Court had no appellate jurisdiction since a penalty of death has not been actually imposed. La. Const, art. V, Section 5(D). LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bright, Dan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-994.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the stay and entertain the application at the next conference. MARCUS, J., would grant and remand to the court of appeal. This Court had no appellate jurisdiction since a penalty of death has not been actually imposed. La. Const, art. V, Section 5(D). LEMMON, J., not on panel.

State v. Bright, 684 So. 2d 954, 1996 La. LEXIS 3676, 1996 WL 755173 (La. 1996).

Pincite

684 So. 2d 954 (State v. Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.