State v. Boyd

896 S.W.2d 544, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 WL 237685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1913
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1995·No. Nos. 63343, 66105·Published

Opinion

[545]*545ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Boyd, appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. Consolidated -within this direct appeal, Defendant also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Boyd, 896 S.W.2d 544, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 WL 237685 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

896 S.W.2d 544 (State v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.