State v. Boyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boyd

896 S.W.2d 544, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 WL 237685

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 1995

DocketNos. 63343, 66105

StatusPublished

This text of 896 S.W.2d 544 (State v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boyd, 896 S.W.2d 544, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 WL 237685 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[545]*545ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Boyd, appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. Consolidated -within this direct appeal, Defendant also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[545]*545ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Boyd, appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. Consolidated -within this direct appeal, Defendant also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 S.W.2d 544, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 WL 237685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyd-moctapp-1995.