State v. Bostwick

733 A.2d 235, 249 Conn. 920, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 234

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 16, 1999·No. SC 16127·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 557 (AC 17927), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[921] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16127. Robert M. Berke, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful in order to justify a revocation of probation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 557 (AC 17927), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful in order to justify a revocation of probation?”

State v. Bostwick, 733 A.2d 235, 249 Conn. 920, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 234 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

733 A.2d 235 (State v. Bostwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Bostwick

740 A.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Opinion

Related