State v. Bostwick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Bostwick

733 A.2d 235, 249 Conn. 920, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 234

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 16, 1999

DocketSC 16127

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 733 A.2d 235 (State v. Bostwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bostwick, 733 A.2d 235, 249 Conn. 920, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 234 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 557 (AC 17927), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[921]*921The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16127. Robert M. Berke, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful in order to justify a revocation of probation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 557 (AC 17927), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[921]*921The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16127. Robert M. Berke, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 16, 1999

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful in order to justify a revocation of probation?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

733 A.2d 235, 249 Conn. 920, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bostwick-conn-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack