State v. Boster
290 S.W.3d 763, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 892, 2009 WL 1658023
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Francis Boster appeals his conviction by jury trial for arson in the second degree. On appeal, Mr. Boster contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient for conviction and that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing expert testimony from an unqualified witness.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Boster, 290 S.W.3d 763, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 892, 2009 WL 1658023 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 763 (State v. Boster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutherford v. State
290 S.W.3d 763 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)