Rutherford v. State
290 S.W.3d 763, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2009 WL 1658020
Opinion
Order
James M. Rutherford appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutherford v. State, 290 S.W.3d 763, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2009 WL 1658020 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 763 (Rutherford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Boster
290 S.W.3d 763 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)