State v. Bond
This text of 2001 WI 56 (State v. Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,[]
v.
Ondra BOND, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney *477 general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender.
¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.
[1]
¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
NOTES
[] Motion for reconsideration denied September 21, 2001.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2001 WI 56, 627 N.W.2d 484, 243 Wis. 2d 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bond-wis-2001.