State v. Board of Supervisors

3 So. 143, 91 Miss. 582
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It may be that, as no provision was made by the Legislature for contesting the election, it cannot be done; but, whatever may be true as to this, we are sure that whatever may be the law in this state as to the writ of prohibition, and even if it be true that now mandamus and prohibition are coexistent and concurrent remedies, the one applicable whenever the other is, it is not allowable in such proceeding to inquire into the qualifications of electors, and the legality of the election, as affected by matters not apparent on the face of the returns.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Board of Supervisors, 3 So. 143, 91 Miss. 582 (Mich. 1907).

3 So. 143 (State v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powe v. Forrest County Election Commission
163 So. 2d 656 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Barnes v. Ladner
131 So. 2d 458 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1961)
State v. Board of Supervisors
105 So. 2d 154 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1958)
Hamilton v. Long
180 So. 615 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
State ex rel. Hudson v. Pigott
54 So. 257 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)
Stearns v. State Ex Rel. Biggers
1909 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
McHenry v. State
44 So. 831 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)