State v. Blankenship

660 N.E.2d 448, 74 Ohio St. 3d 522
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 14, 1996·No. No. 95-1923·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its entry.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Blankenship, 660 N.E.2d 448, 74 Ohio St. 3d 522 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 448 (State v. Blankenship) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related