State v. Black

188 S.E.2d 764, 14 N.C. App. 668, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2222
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMay 24, 1972
DocketNo. 7219SC284
StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E.2d 764 (State v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Black, 188 S.E.2d 764, 14 N.C. App. 668, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2222 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s court appointed counsel concedes that he is unable to find any error in the record but asks that this court [669]*669review the record for possible error. This we have done and conclude that the record is free from prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Judges Parker and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E.2d 764, 14 N.C. App. 668, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-black-ncctapp-1972.