State v. Black
190 S.E.2d 467, 281 N.C. 624, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1135
This text of 190 S.E.2d 467 (State v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Black, 190 S.E.2d 467, 281 N.C. 624, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1135 (N.C. 1972).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
David Robert BLACK.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Christine A. Witcover, Associate Atty., for the State.
Daniel J. Walton, for defendant.
Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question, 14 N.C.App. 373, 188 S.E.2d 634.
Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Black
188 S.E.2d 634 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
190 S.E.2d 467, 281 N.C. 624, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-black-nc-1972.