State v. Black

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Black

952 S.W.2d 383, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671, 1997 WL 587068

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 1997·No. No. 71924·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of delivery of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him, in accordance with the jury’s assessment, to five years imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth [384]*384the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of delivery of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him, in accordance with the jury’s assessment, to five years imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth [384]*384the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Black, 952 S.W.2d 383, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671, 1997 WL 587068 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

952 S.W.2d 383 (State v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.