State v. Black

935 S.W.2d 83, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964, 1996 WL 688587
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 3, 1996·No. No. 68167·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lindell Black, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a [84]*84weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(4) (Cum.Supp. 1993), entered by the Circuit Court of St. Francois County after a jury trial, and appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Black, 935 S.W.2d 83, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964, 1996 WL 688587 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

935 S.W.2d 83 (State v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 571.030.1
Missouri § 571.030.1(4)