State v. Bien

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bien

265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2008 WL 4387867

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 30, 2008

DocketWD 68291

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 S.W.3d 349 (State v. Bien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bien, 265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2008 WL 4387867 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tommy Bien appeals his convictions for forcible rape, attempted forcible rape, forcible sodomy, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. In his sole Point Relied On, Appellant argues that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tommy Bien appeals his convictions for forcible rape, attempted forcible rape, forcible sodomy, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. In his sole Point Relied On, Appellant argues that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2008 WL 4387867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bien-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack