State v. Bien

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bien

265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2008 WL 4387867

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. WD 68291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tommy Bien appeals his convictions for forcible rape, attempted forcible rape, forcible sodomy, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. In his sole Point Relied On, Appellant argues that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tommy Bien appeals his convictions for forcible rape, attempted forcible rape, forcible sodomy, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. In his sole Point Relied On, Appellant argues that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bien, 265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2008 WL 4387867 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

265 S.W.3d 349 (State v. Bien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related