C.M.D. Ex Rel. Desmond v. Blumhorst
This text of 265 S.W.3d 349 (C.M.D. Ex Rel. Desmond v. Blumhorst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Wendy Dawn Blumhorst (Mother) appeals the judgment in favor of Sean Desmond (Father) on the basis that it does not conform to the parties’ agreement as to the splitting of child tax credits and abatement of child support during the summer. On appeal, Mother argues that the transcript reflects an agreement as to custody and visitation only. Having carefully considered Mother’s contentions on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the decision of the trial court. A published formal opinion would have no precedential value, and the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2008 WL 4387952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cmd-ex-rel-desmond-v-blumhorst-moctapp-2008.