C.M.D. Ex Rel. Desmond v. Blumhorst

265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2008 WL 4387952
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. WD 68402·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wendy Dawn Blumhorst (Mother) appeals the judgment in favor of Sean Desmond (Father) on the basis that it does not conform to the parties’ agreement as to the splitting of child tax credits and abatement of child support during the summer. On appeal, Mother argues that the transcript reflects an agreement as to custody and visitation only. Having carefully considered Mother’s contentions on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the decision of the trial court. A published formal opinion would have no precedential value, and the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.M.D. Ex Rel. Desmond v. Blumhorst, 265 S.W.3d 349, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2008 WL 4387952 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

265 S.W.3d 349 (C.M.D. Ex Rel. Desmond v. Blumhorst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bien
265 S.W.3d 349 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)