State v. Berry

660 N.E.2d 740, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1520, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Berry. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 Ohio St. 3d 1504
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 1996·No. 93-2592·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga County, No. 60531. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to amend procedure and set briefing schedule,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective February 8,1996, that the motion to amend procedure and set briefing schedule be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that copies of Dr. Resnick’s competency evaluation of Wilford Berry shall be served by the Clerk upon counsel of record for the parties within two days of receipt of the evaluation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that each party shall file a brief, within twenty days of the filing of Dr. Resnick’s report, to address whether this court should hold a competency hearing and, if so, what procedures should be followed. Each party may file a responsive brief no later than ten days from the date of filing of the opposing party’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Berry, 660 N.E.2d 740, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1520, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3854 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 740 (State v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.