State v. Berry

103 Mo. 367
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Thomas, J.

Defendant was tried in the criminal court of Greene county on change of venue from Taney county, for a felonious assault, and was by a jury found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. He has appealed to this court, and urges various alleged errors for which the judgment of the trial court should be reversed. The errors alleged, however, appear only in what purports to be a bill of [368] exceptions filed in vacation of tbe court, and the record nowhere shows that the time to file this bill of exceptions was extended by the order of the court or that it was filed by the order of the court, and no error of the record proper being assigned and none being found, upon the authority of the cases of State v. Hill, 98 Mo. 570, and State v. Broderick, 79 Mo. 622, the judgment is affirmed.

All of division number 2 concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Berry, 103 Mo. 367 (Mo. 1890).

103 Mo. 367 (State v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone Hill Wine Co. v. Buzzard & Buzzard
127 S.W. 945 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
McKinney v. Wright Lumber Co.
109 S.W. 103 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Linahan v. Barley
28 S.W. 84 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
State v. Russell
27 S.W. 1107 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
State v. Ryan
22 S.W. 486 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
State v. Sweeney
54 Mo. App. 580 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
State v. Mosley
22 S.W. 804 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
21 S.W. 1094 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
State v. Mansfield
106 Mo. 110 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)