State v. Berg
This text of 208 P.3d 1006 (State v. Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Kevin Richard BERG, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The state petitions for reconsideration. In State v. Berg, 223 Or.App. 387, 196 P.3d 547 (2008), we affirmed defendant's conviction but remanded for resentencing in light of State v. Ice, 343 Or. 248, 170 P.3d 1049 (2007), rev'd and rem'd, 555 U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 711, 172 L.Ed.2d 517 (2009). The state now argues that, in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ice, our remand for resentencing was erroneous. The state is correct. This case is controlled by Oregon v. Ice. Accordingly, we modify our opinion and affirm.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 P.3d 1006, 228 Or. App. 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-berg-orctapp-2009.