State v. Beasley

215 S.W.3d 738, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2007 WL 581951
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. ED 87213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Terrell Beasley, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Beasley, 215 S.W.3d 738, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2007 WL 581951 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

215 S.W.3d 738 (State v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
215 S.W.3d 738 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)