State v. Beane
This text of 2011 ND 81 (State v. Beane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/11/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 80
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Donald Beane, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100380
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nathan K. Madden (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802, for plaintiff and appellee.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, ND 58072, for defendant and appellant. Submitted on brief.
State v. Beane
[¶1] Donald Beane appealed from a criminal judgment entered after his conditional plea of guilty to unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. On appeal, Beane argues the district court erred in denying his motion in limine. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See State v. Beane , 2009 ND 146, 770 N.W.2d 283.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beane-nd-2011.