Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Bass

State v. Bass

708 P.2d 1207, 76 Or. App. 396, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 4000
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 14, 1985
Docket85-4273; CA A35299
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 708 P.2d 1207 (State v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bass, 708 P.2d 1207, 76 Or. App. 396, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 4000 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for sexual abuse in the first degree. He contends that the court erred in allowing evidence of the results of a polygraph examination. He concedes that he and his counsel signed a stipulation that the results of the test would be admissible but contends that, because polygraph results are not scientifically reliable, the test results should have been excluded. The evidence was admissible because of the stipulation. State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lyon
733 P.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
State v. LaStair
726 P.2d 1193 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Fink
720 P.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Bass
708 P.2d 1207 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 P.2d 1207, 76 Or. App. 396, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 4000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bass-orctapp-1985.