State v. Bass
708 P.2d 1207, 76 Or. App. 396, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 4000
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 14, 1985·No. 85-4273; CA A35299·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for sexual abuse in the first degree. He contends that the court erred in allowing evidence of the results of a polygraph examination. He concedes that he and his counsel signed a stipulation that the results of the test would be admissible but contends that, because polygraph results are not scientifically reliable, the test results should have been excluded. The evidence was admissible because of the stipulation. State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bass, 708 P.2d 1207, 76 Or. App. 396, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 4000 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
708 P.2d 1207 (State v. Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lyon
733 P.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
State v. LaStair
726 P.2d 1193 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Fink
720 P.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Bass
708 P.2d 1207 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)