State v. Barts
40 A.2d 639, 132 N.J.L. 420, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 180
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Poetee, Wells, Raffeety, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Colie, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Barts, 40 A.2d 639, 132 N.J.L. 420, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1945).
40 A.2d 639 (State v. Barts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jascalevich
386 A.2d 466 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. Dolton
369 A.2d 17 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Costa
354 A.2d 691 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
State v. Savoie
341 A.2d 598 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
State v. Savoie
320 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State, in Interest of Wo
242 A.2d 17 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
State v. DiModica
179 A.2d 17 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
State v. Begyn
167 A.2d 161 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)
State v. Matule
148 A.2d 848 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
State v. Cottone
145 A.2d 509 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Winne v. County of Bergen
121 A.2d 733 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
State v. Weleck
91 A.2d 751 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
State v. Goodman
89 A.2d 243 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)