State v. Barksdale

99 Ohio St. 3d 1549

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. 2003-0351·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 19294, 2003-Ohio-43. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals, for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained.

It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 19294, 2003-Ohio-43. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals, for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained.

It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

State v. Barksdale, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1549 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

99 Ohio St. 3d 1549 (State v. Barksdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Hickman, Unpublished Decision (7-23-2004)

2004 Ohio 3929 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Opinion

Related