State v. Barksdale

789 N.E.2d 1116, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1434
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 2003
Docket2003-0351
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 789 N.E.2d 1116 (State v. Barksdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barksdale, 789 N.E.2d 1116, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1434 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 19294, 2003-Ohio-43. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause consolidated with 2003-0350, State v. Reine, Montgomery App. No. 19157, 2003-0hio-50.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hickman, Unpublished Decision (7-23-2004)
2004 Ohio 3929 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Gooden, Unpublished Decision (5-27-2004)
2004 Ohio 2699 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 N.E.2d 1116, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barksdale-ohio-2003.