State v. Baptiste

26 La. Ann. 134
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1874
DocketNo. 4622
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 134 (State v. Baptiste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baptiste, 26 La. Ann. 134 (La. 1874).

Opinions

Ludblin©, C. J.

In this case there are several bills of exceptions to the rulings of the judge a quo.

It will be necessary to notice only one of them. The State offered as a witness one Ward, to prove admissions made by the prisoners. Objection was made to permitting the witness to testify, on the ground that he was disqualified by law from testifying, having been convicted of an infamous crime. A pardon of the Acting Governor, P. B. S. Pinchback, was produced. It was granted after the convict had served out the term of his imprisonment, and it is denied that in such a case the Governor had the right to grant a pardon. Such is our opinon. The Governor may pardon a convict while some portion of the penalty after judgment is unsatisfied, but when the judgment has been satisfied there is nothing to pardon. By a rule of evidence one convicted of an infamous crime is disqualified from giving evidence in a court of justice, and we know of no law which authorizes the Governor to remove the disability except by a pardon legally granted. It is from the penalty inflicted by the judgment of the court that the Governor can pardon, and not from the consequences of a civil rule resulting from a former conviction. As well might it be claimed that the Governor could grant indulgences in advance of the commission of crimes.

[136]*136The judge erred in permitting the witness to testify. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court be set aside, and that there be judgment remanding the case for a new trial, according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Advisory Opinion of Governor Civil Rights
306 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
State v. Childers
2 So. 2d 189 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Page v. Watson
192 So. 205 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
State v. Taylor
133 So. 349 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
State v. Lee
132 So. 219 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
State v. Harris
117 So. 820 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Sanders v. State
1 S.W.2d 901 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Jamison v. Flanner
228 P. 82 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)
Singleton v. State
38 Fla. 297 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)
McNamee v. State
51 N.W. 821 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1892)
Carr v. State
19 Tex. Ct. App. 635 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)
Hunnicutt v. State
18 Tex. Ct. App. 498 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)
Ex parte Powell
73 Ala. 517 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baptiste-la-1874.