State v. Baker

260 S.W.3d 435, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2008 WL 3843570
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 19, 2008
DocketED 90298
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 435 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baker, 260 S.W.3d 435, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2008 WL 3843570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Baker (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of producing a controlled substance, Section 195.211, RSMo 2000, 1 and one count of resisting arrest, Section 575.150. Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).

1

. All further references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Puetz v. State
260 S.W.3d 435 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 435, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2008 WL 3843570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-moctapp-2008.