State v. Baker

172 S.W.3d 505, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964, 2005 WL 2416628
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 2005·No. No. ED 85000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barry K. Baker (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of murder in the first degree. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction in that the evidence did not [506] show deliberation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the evidence was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant deliberated before shooting the victim. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Baker, 172 S.W.3d 505, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1964, 2005 WL 2416628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

172 S.W.3d 505 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shinn
921 S.W.2d 70 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996)