State v. Baker
Opinion
ORDER
Barry K. Baker (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of murder in the first degree. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction in that the evidence did not [506] show deliberation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the evidence was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant deliberated before shooting the victim. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
172 S.W.3d 505 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.