State v. Bailey

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bailey

2010 Ohio 720, 923 N.E.2d 150, 124 Ohio St. 3d 443

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2010·No. 2007-1787·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *444 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Christine Y. Jones, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *444 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Christine Y. Jones, for appellant.

State v. Bailey, 2010 Ohio 720, 923 N.E.2d 150, 124 Ohio St. 3d 443 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

2010 Ohio 720 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related