State v. Bailey

878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2007·No. 2007-1787·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-060918. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2007-0052, State v. Simpkins, Cuyahoga App. No. 87692, 2006-Ohio-6028; and briefing schedule stayed.

[1456]*1456O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. O’Connor, J., would consolidate the appeal with 2007-1415, State v. Mosmeyer, Hamilton App. No. C-060747. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-060918. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2007-0052, State v. Simpkins, Cuyahoga App. No. 87692, 2006-Ohio-6028; and briefing schedule stayed.

State v. Bailey, 878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

878 N.E.2d 33 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Simpkins, Unpublished Decision (11-16-2006)

2006 Ohio 6028 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Opinion

Related