State v. Bailey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Haw. 383
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 30, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000396·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000396 30-OCT-2013 12:27 PM

SCWC-12-0000396

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BLADESIN-ISAIAH BAILEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

ANDREW JOSIAH RODRIGUEZ, Respondent/Defendant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000396; CR. NO. 10-1-0819)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on

September 19, 2013 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Bladesin-

Isaiah Bailey is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 30, 2013.

Shawn A. Luiz, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Sonja P. McCullen, for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bailey, (haw 2013).

State v. Bailey (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.