State v. Bailey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Haw. 383
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000395·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000395 05-SEP-2013 12:04 PM

SCWC-12-0000395

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BLADESIN-ISAIAH K. BAILEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000395; CR. NO. 10-1-1061)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on July 25, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 5, 2013.

Shawn A. Luiz /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bailey, (haw 2013).

State v. Bailey (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.