State v. B. L. K. (In re B. L. K.)
Opinion
*228Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant con-tends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him of all the possible results of the proceedings as required by ORS 426.100(1)(c), including the possibility of conditional release or voluntary treatment. The state concedes that, under State v. M. M. ,
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
422 P.3d 431 (State v. B. L. K. (In re B. L. K.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.