State v. B. L. K. (In re B. L. K.)
Opinion
*241Appellant seeks reversal of a supplemental judgment of continued commitment, committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him of all of his rights that are applicable to a recommitment hearing, as required by ORS 426.301(3) and ORS 426.303. The state concedes that, under State v. M. M. ,
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
422 P.3d 433 (State v. B. L. K. (In re B. L. K.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.