State v. Ayche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ayche

723 So. 2d 952, 1999 La. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 21348

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1999

DocketNo. 98-KO-2345

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 723 So. 2d 952 (State v. Ayche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ayche, 723 So. 2d 952, 1999 La. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 21348 (La. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. Given that the only evidence introduced by relator at trial addressed the legality of his investigatory stop, the district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which it will determine whether trial counsel’s failure to pursue relator’s motion to suppress constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator may again appeal from any adverse ruling on his claim in the district court. In all other respects, the application is denied.

VICTORY, TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would deny the writ.

MARCUS, J., not on panel. See La.S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, Sec. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. Given that the only evidence introduced by relator at trial addressed the legality of his investigatory stop, the district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which it will determine whether trial counsel’s failure to pursue relator’s motion to suppress constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator may again appeal from any adverse ruling on his claim in the district court. In all other respects, the application is denied.

VICTORY, TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would deny the writ.

MARCUS, J., not on panel. See La.S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, Sec. 3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 So. 2d 952, 1999 La. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 21348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ayche-la-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack