Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Armstrong

State v. Armstrong

2010 Ohio 724, 923 N.E.2d 611, 124 Ohio St. 3d 473
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 4, 2010
Docket2008-1241
StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 724 (State v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Armstrong, 2010 Ohio 724, 923 N.E.2d 611, 124 Ohio St. 3d 473 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered by our opinion in, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of, State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *474 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thorin Freeman, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Singleton
2009 Ohio 6434 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 724, 923 N.E.2d 611, 124 Ohio St. 3d 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstrong-ohio-2010.