State v. Armstrong

879 N.E.2d 782, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1473
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 2008
Docket2007-2279
StatusPublished

This text of 879 N.E.2d 782 (State v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Armstrong, 879 N.E.2d 782, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 21831, 2007-Ohio-5648. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent. On motion for stay of execution of sentence. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Armstrong, 21831 (10-19-2007)
2007 Ohio 5648 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
879 N.E.2d 782, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstrong-ohio-2008.