State v. Armendariz

307 S.W.3d 229, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 424, 2010 WL 1438931
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 2010·No. WD 70319·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Humberto Armendariz appeals his convictions following a jury trial for second degree assault, section 565.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2009, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and sentences to fifteen and twenty years imprisonment, respectively. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in overruling his objection to the prosecutor’s closing argument concerning Armendariz’s failure *230 to call several people as witnesses. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Armendariz, 307 S.W.3d 229, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 424, 2010 WL 1438931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

307 S.W.3d 229 (State v. Armendariz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fordyce v. State
307 S.W.3d 229 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)