Fordyce v. State
307 S.W.3d 229, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, 2010 WL 1438907
Opinion
ORDER
William Fordyce appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fordyce v. State, 307 S.W.3d 229, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, 2010 WL 1438907 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
307 S.W.3d 229 (Fordyce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Armendariz
307 S.W.3d 229 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)