State v. Arbaugh

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Arbaugh

676 N.E.2d 1181, 78 Ohio St. 3d 133

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1997·No. No. 96-2736·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hilliard v. Elfrink (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 155, 672 N.E.2d 166. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for that court to address appellant’s remaining assignment of error, which was found to be moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hilliard v. Elfrink (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 155, 672 N.E.2d 166. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for that court to address appellant’s remaining assignment of error, which was found to be moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

State v. Arbaugh, 676 N.E.2d 1181, 78 Ohio St. 3d 133 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

676 N.E.2d 1181 (State v. Arbaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related