State v. Apanovitch

114 N.E.3d 217, 2018 Ohio 5210, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1467
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2018·No. 2016-0696·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

O'Donnell, J., dissents, with an opinion.

O'DONNELL, J., dissenting.

{¶ 1} Respectfully, I dissent from the court's decision to deny reconsideration thereby leaving in place its decision to remand the case to the trial court.

{¶ 2} I would grant reconsideration of the decision to remand. The case should not be remanded. This case is over. Because the trial court had no jurisdiction to consider the fourth petition for postconviction relief, there is nothing pending in the trial court at this time, and therefore, there is no reason to remand the case.

{¶ 3} The trial court cannot act any further on matters involved in this appeal because they are res judicata. Accordingly, the case should be finalized by this court, not remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Apanovitch, 114 N.E.3d 217, 2018 Ohio 5210, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2018).

114 N.E.3d 217 (State v. Apanovitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
2021 Ohio 1472 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Borecky
2020 Ohio 3697 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Dunkle
2019 Ohio 2900 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)