State v. Apanovitch

2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 908, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1407
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Apanovitch. Read the opinion of the Court — 2018 Ohio 5210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 2017·No. 2016-0696·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 102618 and 102698, 2016-Ohio-2831. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law Nos. I, III, and IV.

O’Donnell, Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., would also accept the appeal on proposition of law No. II. O’Connor, C.J., and French and DeWine, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part and would accept the appeal on proposition of law No. IV only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Apanovitch, 2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 908, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2017).

2017 Ohio 6964 (State v. Apanovitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Apanovitch
2016 Ohio 2831 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)