State v. Angel M.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Angel M.

182 A.3d 1192, 328 Conn. 931

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 25, 2018·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 180 Conn.App. 250, ___ A.3d ___(2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not penalize the defendant for maintaining his innocence at sentencing?

"2. Should the Supreme Court overrule State v. Huey, 199 Conn. 121, 505 A.2d 1242 (1986), because consideration of a defendant's refusal to admit guilt for any purpose at sentencing is a violation of the defendant's right against self-incrimination?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 180 Conn.App. 250, ___ A.3d ___(2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not penalize the defendant for maintaining his innocence at sentencing?

"2. Should the Supreme Court overrule State v. Huey, 199 Conn. 121, 505 A.2d 1242 (1986), because consideration of a defendant's refusal to admit guilt for any purpose at sentencing is a violation of the defendant's right against self-incrimination?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Angel M., 182 A.3d 1192, 328 Conn. 931 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

182 A.3d 1192 (State v. Angel M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related