Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Angel M.

State v. Angel M.

182 A.3d 1192, 328 Conn. 931
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 25, 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 182 A.3d 1192 (State v. Angel M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Angel M., 182 A.3d 1192, 328 Conn. 931 (Colo. 2018).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 180 Conn.App. 250, ___ A.3d ___(2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not penalize the defendant for maintaining his innocence at sentencing?

"2. Should the Supreme Court overrule State v. Huey, 199 Conn. 121, 505 A.2d 1242 (1986), because consideration of a defendant's refusal to admit guilt for any purpose at sentencing is a violation of the defendant's right against self-incrimination?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Angel M.
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020
DeMattio v. Plunkett
199 Conn. App. 693 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2020)
McCarthy v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Caldrello
192 Conn. App. 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
Villafane v. Commissioner of Correction
211 A.3d 72 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
State v. Hanisko
202 A.3d 375 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.3d 1192, 328 Conn. 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-angel-m-conn-2018.