State v. Andrews
This text of 723 P.2d 85 (State v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alaska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
The issue in these consolidated cases is the proper interpretation of AS 12.55.025(e) and (g). The State contends that an offender convicted of separate counts of sexual assault must be sentenced to consecutive, rather than concurrent, terms. Having made a thorough examination of the matter, we have concluded that the opinion of the court of appeals in State v. Andrews, 707 P.2d 900 (Alaska App.1985), correctly treats and disposes of the issues involved, and we adopt such opinion as the opinion of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
723 P.2d 85, 1986 Alas. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-andrews-alaska-1986.