State v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 S.C. 278
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 2013·No. 2013-UP-200·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Anderson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-203393

Appeal From Oconee County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-200 Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed May 15, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

State v. Anderson (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)