State v. Anderson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Eric Anderson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-203393
Appeal From Oconee County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-200 Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed May 15, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellant Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Anderson (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.